Modeling study estimates impact of policies targeting fruits and vegetables and sugary drinks in schools on health outcomes for children and adults
National school food policies have potential to improve health now and later
BOSTON (July 9, 2018)—Providing free fruits and vegetables and limiting sugary drinks in schools could have positive health effects in both the short- and long-term, finds a new Food-PRICE study led by researchers from the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University.
Childhood is a key time to develop attitudes toward food and nutrition and potentially life-long eating habits. School food policies seek to provide and/or encourage healthy food choices during the school day, from offering students free fruits and vegetables outside of standard school meals to outlining limitations on the availability, portion sizes, or sales of sugary drinks.
“Standards such as Smart Snacks in School have largely eliminated sugary drinks in U.S. public schools, but potential effects on obesity in children or long-term health are not known. Also, elementary schools in low-income neighborhoods often have free fresh fruits and vegetables programs, but these have not been expanded to other elementary, middle or high schools; and potential long-term health effects have not been evaluated,” said senior author Dariush Mozaffarian, M.D., Dr.P.H., dean of the Friedman School.
The study, published in PLOS ONE on July 6, used a comparative risk assessment model to estimate the impact that implementing national food policies in U.S. elementary, middle and high schools could have on dietary intake and body mass index (BMI) in children and what cardiometabolic disease outcomes might be influenced in adulthood.
“As children consume more than one-third of their daily meals and snacks in school, having policies focused on healthy food options in school is important. What we need to know is how these policies are changing food choice, nutrition, and health,” said Katherine L. Rosettie, MPH, first and corresponding author of the study. Rosettie conducted the work when she was a research scholar at the Friedman School and she is now a researcher at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.
Fruits and vegetables
The researchers estimated that a provision for free fruits and vegetables would lead to an increase in habitual fruit consumption across school-age children over a period of one-two years, as follows:
- 17 percent increase for children in elementary school;
- 22 percent in middle school; and
- 25 percent in high school.
A limitation on sugary drinks would decrease habitual consumption and have a modest effect on BMI across school-age children, specifically:
- 27 percent decrease in consumption and .7 percent decrease in BMI for children in elementary school;
- 19 percent and .5 percent in middle school; and
- 15 percent and .5 percent in high school.
In analyses including the potential effects of a national fruits and vegetables provision on BMI, the researchers estimated an additional 0.1 percent reduction.
If such school food policies had been implemented when current adults were children, the researchers estimated that a provision for fruits and vegetables would increase fruit intake of these adults by 19 percent and vegetable intake by 2 percent and decrease consumption of sugary drinks by 24 percent. If they had been implemented together, the researchers estimated that the free fruits and vegetables provision and limitation on sugary drinks would prevent more than 22,000 adult deaths per year due to heart disease, diabetes or stroke, or 3 percent of total annual cardiometabolic deaths. Reduced consumption of sugary drinks was estimated to have the largest impact, averting more than 14,000 adult deaths per year.
In addition to health outcomes, understanding the dietary and nutritional effects of existing policies also may help estimate the potential impact of their expansion or repeal.
“Identifying the benefits of school food policies helps to inform how to enhance these programs as well as the potential for harm if they were to be weakened or cut,” said Mozaffarian. “Our findings suggest that eliminating sugary drinks and providing free fruits and vegetables in schools has small effects on obesity in childhood but real potential for meaningful long-term health benefits into adulthood.”
In previous work, members of this research team reviewed school food policies from the U.S., Canada, Europe and New Zealand and found that the policies were effective at increasing children’s consumption of healthy foods and decreasing consumption of sugary drinks and unhealthy snacks in school.
The comparative risk assessment model estimated the effects of a free fruits and vegetable provision and sugary drink limitations on diet and body mass index (BMI) in children ages five-18. The researchers used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys for 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 on baseline BMI and intakes of fruits, vegetables and sugar-sweetened beverages; impacts of these policies on diet from meta-analyses of interventions; and estimated effects of dietary changes on BMI from trials and cohorts. To estimate the effects of these policies on long-term changes, they used a meta-analysis of long-term within-person correlations of childhood and adult diets, meta-analyses of diet and cardiometabolic disease, and data on national cardiometabolic disease deaths from the National Center for Health Statistics for 2012.
The study is part of the Food Policy Review and Intervention Cost-Effectiveness (Food-PRICE) research initiative, an international collaboration of researchers working to identify nutrition strategies that can have the greatest impact on improving health outcomes in the United States.
This work was supported by awards from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01HL130735 and R01HL115189). The content of this announcement is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Additional authors on this study are Renata Micha, R.D., Ph.D., Frederick Cudhea, Ph.D., and Jose L. Peñalvo, Ph.D., all Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University; Martin O’Flaherty, M.D., Ph.D., University of Liverpool; Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard, M.D., M.Sc., M.A., University of Liverpool, and Imperial College London; Christina D. Economos, Ph.D., Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University; and Laurie P. Whitsel, Ph.D., American Heart Association.
Rosettie, K.L. et al. (2018) Comparative risk assessment of school food environment policies and childhood diets, childhood obesity, and future cardiometabolic mortality in the United States. PLoS ONE. doi: doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200378
About the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University
The Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University is the only independent school of nutrition in the United States. The school’s eight degree programs – which focus on questions relating to nutrition and chronic diseases, molecular nutrition, agriculture and sustainability, food security, humanitarian assistance, public health nutrition, and food policy and economics – are renowned for the application of scientific research to national and international policy.